Cash ROCE: does reinvested capital create value?
2026-07-06 · By Lubin Danilo, founder of Lubin Investment
Analyze a stock on Lubin Investment
Cash ROCE measures how much cash a company generates each year for every dollar of capital (debt and equity) employed in its business. A high Cash ROCE means reinvesting in the business truly creates value. A low Cash ROCE means the money reinvested barely earns more than its cost, or even less.
- Cash ROCE measures cash generated each year relative to the total capital employed in the business (debt plus equity), not just accounting profit.
- Roper Technologies posts a Cash ROCE of 25.8%: every dollar of capital employed returns about 26 cents of cash a year.
- Carnival, the cruise line group, caps out at 8.5%: its ships cost hundreds of millions of dollars and take years to earn back that level of capital employed.
- ASML reaches an extreme Cash ROCE of 116.7%, a direct consequence of its near monopoly on EUV lithography.
- A high and stable Cash ROCE over time is one of the most reliable signals of a business's real quality, harder to manipulate than accounting profit.
What is Cash ROCE
ROCE stands for return on capital employed. It's the cash generated each year by the business, measured against the total capital used to run it: shareholder equity plus debt. The cash version, the one I use, replaces accounting profit with the cash actually generated, because accounting profit is easier to dress up through depreciation choices or one-off items. Take a company that needs $100 million in capital (plants, machinery, inventory, minus supplier debts) to operate, and generates $20 million of cash each year from that capital: its Cash ROCE is 20%. The higher this figure, the more every dollar the company reinvests into its business pays off.
Roper Technologies: every reinvested dollar returns 26 cents a year
Roper Technologies owns dozens of small niche software and industrial equipment businesses, each with a dominant position in its market. Its Cash ROCE reaches 25.8%, a high level that's also stable from one year to the next. This figure tells a simple story: when Roper buys a new company or invests in an existing one, the money committed generates a cash return well above its cost of financing. That's exactly what I want to see in a company that keeps growing through acquisitions: proof that every dollar spent actually creates value, rather than simply buying growth at a steep price.
Carnival: the cruise ship that must spend heavily to earn a little
Carnival, the cruise giant, illustrates the other extreme. Building a single ship costs several hundred million dollars, and that ship takes years to generate enough cash to earn back that initial investment. As a result, Carnival's Cash ROCE caps out at 8.5%, far below Roper's. That's not necessarily a bad business, its sales are in fact growing 54.1% a year amid the current travel demand rebound, but it's a structurally capital hungry business, where every reinvested dollar returns far less than elsewhere. A low Cash ROCE doesn't condemn a business, but it sets a natural limit on how fast it can create value simply by reinvesting its cash.
The extreme case: ASML at 116.7%
ASML pushes the Cash ROCE logic to the extreme, with a return on invested capital of 116.7%, meaning more than a dollar of cash generated each year for every dollar of capital employed. This outlier figure is explained by ASML's near monopoly on EUV lithography (the etching technology required for the most advanced chips): the company can charge a high price for its machines without needing proportionally enormous capital to produce them, unlike a chip foundry that must build $15 to $30 billion factories. A Cash ROCE this high is rare and generally signals an exceptional competitive advantage, as long as it holds over time.
| Company | Cash ROCE | What it reveals |
|---|---|---|
| Roper Technologies | 25.8% | Software compounder, growth through profitable acquisitions |
| Carnival | 8.5% | Highly capital intensive business (ships), structurally lower return |
| ASML | 116.7% | Technological near monopoly, capital employed far below the price charged |
Why this figure matters more than growth alone
A company can post impressive sales growth by spending heavily to get it, for instance building ever more factories or buying ever more rival companies at steep prices. If the Cash ROCE on those investments is low, that growth doesn't necessarily create value for shareholders: it simply consumes more capital than it returns. That's why I never look at growth alone. A company growing more slowly but with a high Cash ROCE can create more value, dollar for dollar reinvested, than one growing fast with a low Cash ROCE.
How I use Cash ROCE in my method
Cash ROCE is one of the ten criteria I calculate for every stock in my screener, with a minimum threshold to pass this criterion. I always look at it as a multi year trend, not a single fiscal year, because a high but unstable Cash ROCE tells a different story than a high and stable one. You can check this criterion and the nine others on <a href='/analyse/ROP'>the Roper Technologies analysis page</a>, <a href='/analyse/CCL'>Carnival's page</a>, or <a href='/analyse/ASML.AS'>ASML's page</a>, understand <a href='/methodologie'>how I calculate every criterion</a>, or compare hundreds of companies on this figure with <a href='/screener'>my screener covering more than 5,000 stocks</a>.
FAQ
What is Cash ROCE?
It's the cash a company generates each year, measured against the total capital employed in its business (equity plus debt). It measures whether reinvested capital truly creates value, using actual cash rather than accounting profit, which is easier to dress up.
Why use cash rather than accounting profit?
Because accounting profit depends on depreciation choices and one-off items that can distort it. Cash actually generated is harder to manipulate, making it more reliable for judging whether an investment creates value.
Does a low Cash ROCE mean a bad business?
Not necessarily. Some businesses, like cruise lines or heavy industry, are structurally capital hungry and will always have a lower Cash ROCE than a software company, without that being a sign of poor management.
Why is ASML's Cash ROCE so extreme?
Because ASML holds a near monopoly on EUV lithography and can charge a high price for its machines without needing proportionally enormous capital to produce them, unlike a chip foundry that must build multi billion dollar factories.
Is Cash ROCE one of the Lubin method's ten criteria?
Yes, it's one of the ten objective financial criteria I apply to every stock in my screener, looking at it over several years rather than a single fiscal year.
Analyze a stock on Lubin Investment
About the author
Written by Lubin Danilo, founder of Lubin Investment. A self-taught individual investor, I find fundamental analysis fascinating, and it has delivered excellent results. For three years now, my performance has beaten the S&P 500. But analyzing every stock took too much time: sites with incomplete data, calculation methods and criteria never aligned with mine. And spotting the best stocks was just as time-consuming, even with my own well-defined checklist. So I put my software development background to work to build this software, base my investment strategy on its results, and share it with people who share the same passion as me. It judges a company's quality and its price separately, using criteria drawn from the financial literature (Warren Buffett, Michael Mauboussin, Aswath Damodaran).