Lubin Investment · Blog

Should you buy Garmin (GRMN) stock in 2026?

2026-07-19 ·

GRMN: see the full analysis on Lubin Investment

Garmin is a very high-quality business, one of the best scores in my filter: it owes nothing to anyone, has paid a growing dividend for years, and is accelerating across three different businesses at once, smartwatches, aviation, and marine. The problem isn't the company, it's the price: the stock trades today 44% above my fair buy target. Here's how I separate the two.

A company the public still wrongly sums up as 'a GPS maker'

Many people still know Garmin as 'the GPS brand from before smartphones.' That description has been outdated for a long time. Today, Garmin sells premium smartwatches (fitness, running, diving, golf), full avionics systems for private and commercial aviation, marine navigation equipment, and embedded automotive solutions. Five different businesses, sharing one common technological backbone: GPS, sensors, and embedded software.

In the first quarter of 2026, this diversification produced a rare result: the three main businesses are accelerating at the same time. The fitness segment (smartwatches) jumped 42%, driven by market share gains at the premium end. Aviation grew 18%, powered by both aircraft manufacturer (OEM) sales and the aftermarket. Marine grew 11%, boosted by deliveries to boat builders and a new generation of sonars (technology that detects depth and underwater obstacles via acoustic echo). Garmin now targets $7.9 billion in 2026 revenue, above the analyst consensus of $7.63 billion.

9 out of 10 criteria: rare financial quality for a hardware maker

My filter evaluates every company on ten concrete financial criteria, and Garmin passes nine, a score very few hardware makers (not just software companies) manage to reach. Net margin comes in at 23.3%, free cash flow margin at 17.1%, and critically, margins keep expanding year after year (the 'margin expansion' criterion passes): Garmin's revenue grows faster than its costs, year after year, a sign of operating discipline rarely seen in hardware, a sector where competition usually drags prices down.

The most striking point remains the balance sheet: zero net debt. Garmin actually holds a positive net cash position, meaning it could repay all its debt with cash on hand and still have money left over. Cash return on capital employed reaches 19.1%, well above my 15% threshold, proof that every dollar reinvested in the business (new factory, new product, buyback) generates a genuine return.

The one weak spot: a lengthening cash cycle

The criterion that fails in my filter is the cash conversion cycle (the number of days between paying suppliers and collecting from customers, inventory included): it comes out to 226 days, and it's lengthening by 5.6 days a year. The main cause is inventory: Garmin ties up 221 days worth of inventory alone, a figure that reflects the nature of its businesses. Building a smartwatch, a certified avionics system, or a marine sonar requires stocking up months ahead of sale, to anticipate seasonality (holiday gifting for watches) and aviation's long production cycles.

This isn't disqualifying: return on capital stays excellent despite this long cycle, meaning Garmin still puts the cash tied up in inventory to very good use. But it's worth watching: if the cycle keeps lengthening without profitability keeping pace, that would signal deteriorating inventory management, not just normal seasonality.

The moat: certifications nobody catches up on overnight

Garmin's real strength isn't a single household brand the way Apple or Whoop are on smartwatches: it's how hard it is to dislodge on heavily regulated professional markets. In aviation, getting an avionics certification (regulatory approval to install a flight or navigation system on an aircraft) takes years and costs tens of millions of dollars. This quarter, Daher unveiled its new TBM 980 turboprop fitted with Garmin's G3000 PRIME avionics, and the HondaJet Elite II became the first twin-engine business jet certified with Garmin's Emergency Autoland technology (a system that lands the plane automatically if the pilot becomes incapacitated).

On smartwatches, by contrast, competition is head-on against Apple Watch and younger brands like Whoop. There, Garmin's moat is different: specialized expertise recognized by demanding athletes (diving, trail running, golf, triathlon) rather than a closed ecosystem like Apple's. It's a narrower moat, which explains why this segment must keep innovating (the 42% market share gains this quarter) to stay relevant, whereas in aviation, once certified, Garmin is protected for years.

The price: expensive, by a wide margin, despite the quality

Garmin's P/FCF (price-to-free-cash-flow, the stock price divided by the cash it generates each year) stands at 37.7 times. Over its last five years, this multiple has historically sat much lower: today's level ranks in the 89th percentile of its own history, meaning it's pricier than 89% of trading days over the past five years, close to the most expensive it has ever been.

My model calculates a fair buy price of $139.82 for Garmin, based on current free cash flow per share ($6.61) and a conservative exit multiple. The current price, $249.56, sits 44% above that target. That's not a minor detail: at this level, even if Garmin keeps executing perfectly across its three businesses, the market has already priced in much of that good news, leaving very little room for disappointment, say an aviation quarter that slows, or a cash conversion cycle that keeps worsening.

One point worth noting separately: Garmin pays a $4.20 annual dividend (1.7% yield), growing 8.4% a year over five years, with a moderate 40.2% payout ratio. That's rare for a company investing this heavily in product innovation: it shows Garmin can fund its growth and reward shareholders at the same time, without debt.

How I make the call, without emotion

Garmin is exactly the kind of business my filter is built to spot: diversified across three simultaneously accelerating businesses, zero debt, high return on capital, a growing dividend. The issue is never the quality, it's the price paid today for that quality. At 37.7 times free cash flow, near its 5-year record for expensiveness, and 44% above my fair buy price, the stock leaves almost no margin of safety.

If you believe the simultaneous acceleration across all three businesses will last several more years and justifies a premium, the current position can be defended. If you'd rather buy with a margin of safety than pay for flawless execution the market already expects, my target price ($139.82) remains the level to watch. I never take a position for you: I set a price, and I wait for it to come to me.

FAQ

Why does Garmin score 9 out of 10 in the quality filter?

Because it passes nearly every essential financial criterion: profitability, sales and free cash flow growth, zero net debt, 19.1% return on capital, expanding margins. The one failing criterion is the cash conversion cycle, which lengthens due to the inventory needed for aviation and watch seasonality.

Can Garmin really compete with Apple Watch on smartwatches?

Not in the same way. Garmin isn't trying to build a closed ecosystem like Apple's, but rather specialized expertise recognized by demanding athletes (diving, trail running, golf, triathlon). It's a narrower moat than Apple's, which is why this segment must keep innovating to gain market share, which it did this quarter (+42%).

Why is Garmin's cash conversion cycle lengthening?

Mainly because of inventory: building a smartwatch, a certified avionics system, or a marine sonar requires stocking up months ahead of sale, to anticipate seasonality and aviation's long production cycles. It isn't alarming as long as return on capital stays high, but it's worth watching.

Is Garmin's current price a good entry point?

Not according to my model: the price ($249.56) sits 44% above my fair buy price ($139.82), and the 37.7x P/FCF ranks in the 89th percentile of the stock's own history, close to its most expensive point in 5 years. This is not investment advice, do your own research.

GRMN: see the full analysis on Lubin Investment

About the author

Written by Lubin Danilo, founder of Lubin Investment. A self-taught individual investor, I find fundamental analysis fascinating, and it has delivered excellent results. For three years now, my performance has beaten the S&P 500. But analyzing every stock took too much time: sites with incomplete data, calculation methods and criteria never aligned with mine. And spotting the best stocks was just as time-consuming, even with my own well-defined checklist. So I put my software development background to work to build this software, base my investment strategy on its results, and share it with people who share the same passion as me. It judges a company's quality and its price separately, using criteria drawn from the financial literature (Warren Buffett, Michael Mauboussin, Aswath Damodaran).