Nike (NKE) vs Lululemon Athletica (LULU): the numbers side by side
By Lubin Danilo, founder of Lubin Investment
On our 10 quality criteria, Lululemon Athletica comes out ahead. On price, Lululemon Athletica trades cheapest relative to its free cash flow. In other words, comparing Nike and Lululemon Athletica means answering two separate questions, and they do not necessarily have the same answer.
Both stocks side by side
| Metric | Nike (NKE) | Lululemon Athletica (LULU) |
|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 2/10 | 8/10 |
| P/FCF | 208.7× | 15.9× |
| Sector | Footwear & Accessories | Apparel Retail |
| Price | not available | 114.23 USD |
| Market cap | 60.3B | 13.7B |
Quality: which one passes more criteria
Lululemon Athletica passes 8/10 of our quality criteria, against 2/10 for Nike. The criteria are identical for both: profitability, revenue and free cash flow per share growth, share count control, free cash flow margin, margin expansion, return on capital, debt, conversion of earnings into cash, and cash conversion cycle. No weighting, no opinion: it is a count.
Price: which one is cheaper
Lululemon Athletica trades at 15.9× its free cash flow, against 208.7× for Nike. A lower multiple means you pay fewer years of cash for the same slice of the business. Mind the reflex though: a low multiple is only a bargain if the quality holds up. That is why we judge the two separately, and never one through the other.
Nike's accounts are public: 10-K filings with the SEC (EDGAR).
Lululemon Athletica's accounts are public: 10-K filings with the SEC (EDGAR).
How to decide
There is no "better stock" in the abstract, there is a better stock for a given goal. If you want the most solid financial quality, follow the score. If you want to pay the least for the cash produced, follow the P/FCF. If both point to the same name, the case is simple. If they diverge, you are trading off paying more for a better business against paying less for a more questionable one. The two detailed pages below give the criterion-by-criterion breakdown for Nike and for Lululemon Athletica.
Frequently asked questions
Should you buy Nike or Lululemon Athletica?
Lululemon Athletica passes 8/10 of our quality criteria, against 2/10 for Nike. The criteria are identical for both: profitability, revenue and free cash flow per share growth, share count control, free cash flow margin, margin expansion, return on capital, debt, conversion of earnings into cash, and cash conversion cycle. No weighting, no opinion: it is a count. Lululemon Athletica trades at 15.9× its free cash flow, against 208.7× for Nike. A lower multiple means you pay fewer years of cash for the same slice of the business. Mind the reflex though: a low multiple is only a bargain if the quality holds up. That is why we judge the two separately, and never one through the other.
Nike or Lululemon Athletica: which one is cheaper?
Lululemon Athletica : 15.9× against 208.7×.
Can you hold both?
Nothing prevents it, and it is common when both pass our quality criteria. Keep in mind that two companies in the same sector often react to the same shocks, so holding both diversifies less than it looks. This page is a numbers comparison, not a recommendation.